Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Porosity of Autonomy: (Some) Replies to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Porosity of Autonomy: Social and Biological Constitution of the Patient in Biomedicine”.Jonathan Beever & Nicolae Morar - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (4):4-6.
    Autonomy isn't going anywhere. Yet challenges to autonomy's place of privilege atop the mantle of bioethics are similarly perennial. From our perspective, the emerging literature of microbial biolo...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What deserves our respect? Reexamination of respect for autonomy in the context of the management of chronic conditions.Aya Enzo, Taketoshi Okita & Atsushi Asai - 2019 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (1):85-94.
    The global increase in patients with chronic conditions has led to increased interest in ethical issues regarding such conditions. A basic biomedical principle—respect for autonomy—is being reexamined more critically in its clinical implications. New accounts of this basic principle are being proposed. While new accounts of respect for autonomy do underpin the design of many public programs and policies worldwide, addressing both chronic disease management and health promotion, the risk of applying such new accounts to clinical setting remain understudied. However, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Voices Missing from the Autonomy Discourse (Are Also the Most Indispensable).Julia D. Gibson - 2019 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 12 (1):77-98.
    Jonathan Beever and Nicolae Morar’s (2016) article “The Porosity of Autonomy: Social and Biological Constitution of the Patient in Biomedicine” and its accompanying commentaries in the American Journal of Bioethics—though insightful, innovative, and provocative—overlook key interlocutors necessary for any discussion of whether the mid-twentieth-century biomedical principle of autonomy should be revised or revoked. The conversation sparked by “The Porosity of Autonomy” will remain both incomplete and politically untenable so long as there is no meaningful engagement with persons/communities who appeal to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations