Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Doing business and constructing identities through small talk in workplace instant messaging.Bernie Chun Nam Mak - 2019 - Pragmatics and Society 10 (4):559-583.
    This paper describes how bilingual colleagues living in Hong Kong make small talk in instant messaging to achieve various business-oriented goals and construct multiple identities in the discursive process. Guided by James Paul Gee’s revised framework of discourse analysis, the analyses evidenced that, overall, colleagues use small talk in instant messages to maintain minimal ties with distant partners, fill in silence during computer work, affect informal decision-making at work, and to diffuse useful surrounding information into business talk. These instances interplay (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • "Doing Deference": Identities and relational practices in Chinese online discussion boards.Michael Haugh, Wei-Lin Melody Chang & Daniel Z. Kadar - 2015 - Pragmatics 25 (1):73-98.
    In this paper we examine a key relational practice found in interactions in online discussion boards in Mainland China and Taiwan: ‘doing deference’. In drawing attention to a relational practice that has received attention in quite different research traditions, namely, linguistic pragmatics and conversation analysis, we mean to highlight the possible advantages of an approach to analysis that draws from both in analysing relational work in CMC. We claim in the course of our analysis that the participants are orienting not (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Exam papers as social spaces for control and manipulation: ‘Dear Dr X, please I need to pass this course’.Mostafa Hasrati & Motahareh Mohammadzadeh - 2012 - Critical Discourse Studies 9 (2):177-190.
    In this paper, we take a critical discourse analytic approach to short notes written at the end of exam papers by Iranian students asking for a higher score. Such notes are sometimes written when the student has a feeling that they might fail the exam as a result of not providing satisfactory answers to questions. We consider this to be a manipulative strategy employed by these students to control their professors. Manipulation, however, is often considered an illegitimate source of power (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation