Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. William Harvey and the primacy of the blood.John S. White - 1986 - Annals of Science 43 (3):239-255.
    William Harvey's theoretical commitment to the primacy of the blood developed from his study of the chick in the hen's egg. Harvey's original contribution, that the blood was the first material embodiment of the soul, is shown to be a crucial departure that enabled him to conceive of the general circulation of the blood.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • By analogy to the element of the stars: the divine in Jean Fernel's and William Harvey's theories of generation.Xiaona Wang - 2019 - Intellectual History Review 29 (3):371-387.
    Jean Fernel and William Harvey were leading medical practitioners of their respective generations, but they also worked in natural philosophy, and, in particular, were well known for their works on...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • William Harvey and art misplaced.Phillips Salman - 1992 - Annals of Science 49 (1):3-19.
    William Harvey's De generatione uses a quotation from Seneca's Epistula 58 together with material from Aristotle to oppose the cognitive processes and methods of the artist to those Harvey wishes to require for the anatomist. This paper studies ways in which Harvey, as a deliberate writer, makes rhetorical uses of that opposition to expose false anatomists as those who rely on books rather than on observation and who promulgate sciolist fictions. In showing that they contrast to true anatomists, whose statements (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • William Harvey Revisited.Walter Pagel - 1970 - History of Science 9 (1):1-41.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • De la sangre en circulación : Descartes y Harvey.Julián David Bohórquez Carvajal - 2019 - Discusiones Filosóficas 20 (34):113-129.
    Este ensayo se ocupa del tratamiento dado por René Descartes al descubrimiento de la circulación de la sangre hecho por William Harvey y sus diferencias respecto al papel del corazón en este proceso. Tomando distancia de la interpretación tradicional de la controversia, se concluye que, si bien Harvey fue un declarado aristotélico y Descartes un filósofo de estirpe materialista, los postulados de este último exhiben varios prejuicios escolásticos y una fuerte carga teórica en las observaciones. Por el contrario, la propuesta (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark