Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Existential risk, creativity & well-adapted science.Adrian Currie - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 76:39-48.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Evaluation of Research(ers) and its Threat to Epistemic Pluralisms.Marco Viola - 2017 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 13 (2):55-78.
    While some form of evaluation has always been employed in science (e.g. peer review, hiring), formal systems of evaluation of research and researchers have recently come to play a more prominent role in many countries because of the adoption of new models of governance. According to such models, the quality of the output of both researchers and their institutions is measured, and issues such as eligibility for tenure or the allocation of public funding to research institutions crucially depends on the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Existential Risk, Creativity & Well-Adapted Science.Adrian Currie - forthcoming - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Geoengineering Tensions.Adrian Currie - forthcoming - Futures.
    There has been much discussion of the moral, legal and prudential implications of geoengineering, and of governance structures for both the research and deployment of such technologies. However, insufficient attention has been paid to how such measures might affect geoengineering in terms of the incentive structures which underwrite scientific progress. There is a tension between the features that make science productive, and the need to govern geoengineering research, which has thus far gone underappreciated. I emphasize how geoengineering research requires governance (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations