Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Pharmaceutical patenting and the transformation of American medical ethics.Joseph M. Gabriel - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Science 49 (4):577-600.
    The attitudes of physicians and drug manufacturers in the US toward patenting pharmaceuticals changed dramatically from the mid-nineteenth century to the mid-twentieth. Formerly, physicians and reputable manufacturers argued that pharmaceutical patents prioritized profit over the advancement of medical science. Reputable manufactures refused to patent their goods and most physicians shunned patented products. However, moving into the early twentieth century, physicians and drug manufacturers grew increasingly comfortable with the idea of pharmaceutical patents. In 1912, for example, the American Medical Association dropped (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Out of the Ivory Tower: The Patenting Activity of Canadian University Professors Before the 1980s.Maxime Colleret & Yves Gingras - 2022 - Minerva 60 (2):281-300.
    This study analyses the patenting activities of university science and engineering professors in Canada between 1920 and 1975. Unlike most studies on commercial activities in academia, which typically focus on the post-1980 period and on university practices, we focus on the pre-1980 period and on the individual decisions of professors to patent their inventions. Based on quantitative patent data, we show that patenting, and thus professors’ interest in the possible commercial value of their scientific discoveries made in university laboratories, was (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Intellectual Property and Narratives of Discovery/Invention: The League of Nations' Draft Convention on ‘Scientific Property’ and its Fate.David Philip Miller - 2008 - History of Science 46 (3):299-342.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The uses and justifications for the regulation of intellectual property.John Snapper - 1991 - Social Epistemology 5 (1):78 – 87.
    Abstract The US Constitution states that the primary objective for the regulation of intellectual property is the ?promotion of science and the useful arts?. This objective is too narrow to permit an appreciation of how intellectual property protections are used by inventors, researchers, and engineers.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Canada’s Stem Cell Corporation: Aggregate Concerns and the Question of Public Trust.Matthew Herder & Jennifer Dyck Brian - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (1):73-84.
    This paper examines one nascent entrepreneurial endeavour intended by Canada's Stem Cell Network to catalyze the commercialization of stem cell research: the creation of a company called "Aggregate Therapeutics". We argue that this initiative, in its current configuration, is likely to result in a breach of public trust owing to three inter-related concerns: conflicts of interest; corporate influence on the university research agenda; and the failure to provide some form of direct return for the public's substantial tax dollar investment. These (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Knowledge as property: The Massachusetts Institute of technology and the debate over academic patent policy. [REVIEW]Henry Etzkowitz - 1994 - Minerva 32 (4):383-421.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Appropriation and commercialization of the Pasteur anthrax vaccine.Maurice Cassier - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (4):722-742.
    Whereas Pasteur patented the biotechnological processes that he invented between 1857 and 1873 in the agro-food domain, he did not file any patents on the artificial vaccine preparation processes that he subsequently developed. This absence of patents can probably be explained by the 1844 patent law in France that established the non-patentable status of pharmaceutical preparations and remedies, including those for use in veterinary medicine. Despite the absence of patents, the commercial exploitation of the anthrax vaccine in the 1880s and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations