Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Deliberating Upon the Living Wage to Alleviate In-Work Poverty: A Rhetorical Inquiry Into Key Stakeholder Accounts.Darrin J. Hodgetts, Amanda Maria Young-Hauser, Jim Arrowsmith, Jane Parker, Stuart Colin Carr, Jarrod Haar & Siautu Alefaio - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13:810870.
    Most developed nations have a statutory minimum wage set at levels insufficient to alleviate poverty. Increased calls for a living wage have generated considerable public controversy. This article draws on 25 interviews and four focus groups with employers, low-pay industry representatives, representatives of chambers of commerce, pay consultants, and unions. The core focus is on how participants use prominent narrative tropes for the living wage and against the living wage to argue their respective perspectives. We also document how both affirmative (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Moral Economy and the Ethics of the Real Living Wage in UK Football Clubs.Tony Dobbins & Peter Prowse - 2024 - Journal of Business Ethics 195 (2):299-314.
    Real living wages (RLWs) are an important ethical and moral policy to ensure that employees earn enough to live on. In providing ‘a fair day's pay for a fair day's work’, they set an ethical foundation for liveability. This article explores the ethics and moral economy of the RLW for lower-paid staff in the overlooked economy context of UK professional football, illustrated by a qualitative case study of Luton Town Football Club (LTFC). The article provides theoretical insights grounded in moral (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Addressing Governance Gaps in Global Value Chains: Introducing a Systematic Typology.Stephanie Schrage & Dirk Ulrich Gilbert - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 170 (4):657-672.
    Multinational enterprises dominate the governance of global value chains, such that according to the concept of political corporate social responsibility, they are responsible to address governance gaps throughout the chains, even at the level of their independent suppliers. In practice, MNEs often struggle to cope with the complexity of these governance gaps, and PCSR does not provide a clear definition nor offer guidance for how to analyze and address them. By adopting the notion of governance mechanisms from GVC literature, this (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations