Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Post-criticality and the pursuit of an empirical philosophy of education: epistemology, methodology, ethics.Hans Schildermans, Joris Vlieghe & Kai Wortmann - 2024 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 58 (6):929-939.
    This article examines the relevance of post-criticality as a research stance across various traditions in educational research. After problematizing the dominance of critical approaches centred on deconstruction and denunciation, the authors advocate instead for an empirical philosophy of education. This article sets the stage for a suite of articles, published in this issue, which explore affirmative, engaged methodologies that prioritize proximity to educational practices over detached critique. Collectively, the articles investigate how post-critical methodologies can produce richer understandings of educational realities (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Resisting policing in higher education: wilful White ignorance in the campus safety debate.Rebecca M. Taylor & Martha Perez-Mugg - 2024 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 57 (4-5):923-940.
    Activists have challenged the reach of the carceral state into higher education. Whether calling out the exclusion of currently and formerly incarcerated people from higher education or the ways campus police perpetuate the racial and economic biases that plague the US criminal legal system, these voices offer insights that higher education leaders should take seriously. Yet, these challenges are often met with appeals to safety, which purport to override concerns about the harms produced by extension of the criminal legal system (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Learning in Democracy: Deliberation and Activism as Forms of Education.Rachel Wahl - 2019 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 38 (5):517-536.
    The press and scholars alike often bemoan the failure of civil public deliberation. Yet this insistence on civility excludes people who engage in adversarial tactics, limiting the ideas that are heard within deliberation. Drawing on a deliberative dialogue that occurred in Charlottesville, Virginia, in the aftermath of the deadly White Supremacist rally of 2017, this article reveals how the capacity of deliberation to be inclusive of diverse voices depends upon deliberators’ orientation to learn from people who do not participate in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark