Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)E-Topia as Cosmopolis or Citadel.Martin Hand & Barry Sandywell - 2002 - Theory, Culture and Society 19 (1-2):197-225.
    We present a critical appraisal of the impact of the Internet (and related information technologies) upon processes of democratization and de-democratization in contemporary society. We review accounts of `the information revolution' as these have become polarized into mutually exclusive rhetorics of future cosmopolitan or citadellian e-topias. We question the Manichean assumptions common to both rhetorics: particularly the fetishism of information technology as an intrinsically democratizing or de-democratizing force on societies. In opposition to this new technological fetishism we focus upon (1) (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Teoría crítica, justicia y metafilosofía: La validación de la filosofía política en Nancy Fraser y Axel Honneth.Delfín Ignacio Grueso - 2012 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 16:70-98.
    ¿Puede un filósofo, sin más, tomar el lado de las víctimas, cuando se trata de situaciones de justicia e injusticia? ¿Puede carecer de un punto de vista objetivo acerca de lo que es moralmente bueno o malo? Si el filósofo sostiene que lo que las víctimas demandan, en lugar de redistribución, es reconocimiento, ¿debe proveer una convincente teoría de lo que es el reconocimiento y del modo como él juega un papel en las situaciones de justicia e injusticia? Este artículo (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Contribution to a new critical theory of multiculturalism.Martin Beck Matus tík - 2002 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (4):473-482.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A ‘Transnormative’ View of Society Building: Simmel’s Sociological Epistemology and Philosophical Anthropology of Complex Societies.Gregor Fitzi - 2012 - Theory, Culture and Society 29 (7-8):177-196.
    In an epoch of ‘liquid modernity’, normativity assumes unforeseeable forms. Neither the theories of normative integration nor post-normative approaches can explain its contradiction: binding normativity still prevails, but its validity is limited in space and time. Only a ‘transnormative approach’ can therefore address the issue. An ideal-typical reconstruction of sociological theories as a contrast between normative and transnormative approaches allows us to appreciate the decisive contribution Simmel makes to the understanding of complex societies. A precondition is, however, to explain the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation