Switch to: References

Citations of:

Envisioning Power: Ideologies of Dominance and Crisis

University of California Press (1999)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The social modes of men.Lars Rodseth & Shannon A. Novak - 2000 - Human Nature 11 (4):335-366.
    Here we attempt to define a specifically human ecology within which male reproductive strategies are formulated. By treating the domestic and public spheres of social life as "ecological niches" that men have been forced to compete within or to avoid as best they can, we generate a typology of four "social modes" of human male behavior. We then attempt to explain the broad distribution of social modes within and between human groups based on the relative intensity of scramble and contest (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Social boundary mechanisms.Charles Tilly - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (2):211-236.
    Social boundaries separate us fromthem. Explaining the formation, transformation, activation, and suppression of social boundaries presents knotty problems. It helps to distinguish two sets of mechanisms: (1) those that precipitate boundary change and (2) those that constitute boundary change. Properly speaking, only the constitutive mechanisms produce the effects of boundary change as such. Precipitants of boundary change include encounter, imposition, borrowing, conversation, and incentive shift. Constitutive mechanisms include inscription–erasure, activation–deactivation, site transfer, and relocation. Effects of boundary change include attack–defense sequences. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • A Theory Explaining the Functional Linkage Between the Self, Identity and Cultural Models.Victor C. de Munck - 2013 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 13 (1-2):179-200.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Anthropologists Facing the Collapse of Yugoslavia.Bojan Baskar - 1999 - Diogenes 47 (188):51-63.
    In extreme situations such as war, genocide or refugee crises, anthropologists, who are usually closer to afflicted people than other scholars, face the crucial questions of the utility and responsibility of anthropology. However, anthropologists in particular are susceptible to the way of reasoning that concludes that anthropology as a science (or even as a technique or art) does not offer any answers to these questions. Some become engaged trying to help one way or the other, yet not as anthropologists, since (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark