Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Radical Historicism or Rules of Reproduction? New Debates in Political Marxism.Maïa Pal - 2021 - Historical Materialism 29 (3):33-53.
    This introduction presents the symposium on Sam Knafo and Benno Teschke’s article in Historical Materialism, ‘Political Marxism and the Rules of Reproduction of Capitalism: A Historicist Critique’ (2021). It briefly summarises the foundations of Political Marxism, discusses the broader implications of the debate raised by Knafo and Teschke for questions of collective knowledge-production and methods in Marxist historiography, and outlines the seven contributions of the symposium. The introduction concludes by tracing, through the evolution of debates in Political Marxism and the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • My Capitalism Is Bigger than Yours!Maïa Pal - 2018 - Historical Materialism 26 (3):99-124.
    This article reviews Alex Anievas and Kerem Nişancıoğlu’sHow the West Came to Rule: The Geopolitical Origins of Capitalism(2015). It argues that the book offers a stimulating and ambitious approach to solving the problems of Eurocentrism and the origins of capitalism in growing critical scholarship in historical sociology and International Relations. However, by focusing on the ‘problem of the international’ and proposing a ‘single unified theory’ based on uneven and combined development, the authors present a history of international relations that trades (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Introduction to ‘Britain versus France: How Many Sonderwegs?’.Maïa Pal - 2016 - Historical Materialism 24 (1):3-10.
    In memoriamof the late Ellen Meiksins Wood, this piece firstly remembers the main achievements of her forty years of work. Secondly, it introduces one of her contributions, ‘Britain versus France: How ManySonderwegs?’, until now unavailable in an anglophone publication and reprinted in the present issue. This contribution is a useful reformulation of her arguments concerning radical historicity, the concept of ‘bourgeois revolution’, and the specificity of French and British state formation and their political revolutions – in contrast to arguments for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation