Switch to: References

Citations of:

Dialectical Blindspots

Philosophy and Rhetoric 26 (4):251 - 265 (1993)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Lightening up on the Ad Hominem.John Woods - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):109-134.
    In all three of its manifestations, —abusive, circumstantial and tu quoque—the role of the ad hominem is to raise a doubt about the opposite party’s casemaking bona-fides.Provided that it is both presumptive and provisional, drawing such a conclusion is not a logical mistake, hence not a fallacy on the traditional conception of it. More remarkable is the role of the ad hominem retort in seeking the reassurance of one’s opponent when, on the face of it, reassurance is precisely what he (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Rethinking the Ad Hominem: A Case Study of Chomsky. [REVIEW]R. Metcalf - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (1):29-52.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Effectiveness of Argumentative Strategies.Taeda Jovičić - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (1):29-58.
    In this article, I further analyze the notion of the effectiveness of argumentative strategies, introduced in Jovičić, 2001. The most relevant achievements of the theories of reasonable discussion and the theories of persuasion are called to mind with the aim of explaining the mechanism of the argumentative effectiveness. As a result, a procedure for evaluating the effectiveness of argumentative strategies is suggested.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • New Concepts for Argument Evaluation.Taeda Jovicic - unknown
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations