Switch to: References

Citations of:

Meaning and truth in judicial decision

Helśinki: Juridica. Edited by Aulis Aarnio (1979)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Aulis Aarnio, The Rational as Reasonable. A Treatise on Legal Justification.Jerzy Wröblewski - 1988 - Ratio Juris 1 (3):266-268.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Interpretación Y construcción jurídica.Riccardo Guastini - 2015 - Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 43:11-48.
    Este trabajo bosqueja una teoría analítica y realista de la interpretación jurídica. Analítica, en el sentido que su método es el análisis lógico del lenguaje de los juristas. Realista, en el sentido que, por un lado, sostiene que el derecho es indeterminado y, por otro lado, representa la interpretación desarrollada por los jueces como una actividad intrínsecamente discrecional. En la primera parte, se introducen las distinciones fundamentales entre: interpretación “in abstracto” e interpretación “in concreto”; interpretación cognoscitiva, decisoria, y creativa; interpretación (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Leśniewski-quantifiers and modal arguments in legal discourse.Burkhard Schäfer - 1998 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 6:133.
    Following an idea first proposed by Jerzy Wróblewski, this paperexamines the usefulness of formal logic for comparative legal analysis. Subject of the comparison are the doctrines of mistake and attempt in Germanand English criminal law. These doctrines are distinguished by the interaction of deontic, epistemic and alethic modalities. I propose a purely extensional logic which is based on Leśniewski’s substitutional interpretation ofquantification to analyse differences in the logical structure of the variouscriminal law doctrines.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Dilemma of Normativity: How to Interpret a Rational Reconstruction? [REVIEW]Paul van den Hoven - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (4):411-417.
    In modern argument theory argumentative practice is often analyzed and evaluated in terms of its correspondences with or deviations from a normative model. Such a methodology implies that there are three moments at which evaluations takes place which are not guided by the norms of the model itself because they imply an interpretation of the model by the analyst. This is demonstrated by an analogy with legal practice. this implies that an evaluation of an argumentative practice is not only relative (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On Scholarly Developments in Legal Semiotics.Bernard S. Jackson - 1990 - Ratio Juris 3 (3):415-424.
    This article reviews the opportunities for legal semiotics to contribute to legal philosophy, legal sociology, the reading of legal texts and the analysis of legal language (with bibliography) and surveys the institutional development of legal semiotics.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Formal Model of Legal Argumentation.Giovanni Sartor - 1994 - Ratio Juris 7 (2):177-211.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Principles, Values, and Rules in Legal Decision-Making and the Dimensions of Legal Rationality.Jerzy Wróblewski - 1990 - Ratio Juris 3 (s1):100-117.
    The author singles out various conceptions of rationality used in practical legal discourse: formal and substantive rationality, instrumental goal‐ and means‐rationality, communicative rationality. Practical rationality is expressed in decisions justified by epistemic and axiological premises according to the rules of justificatory reasoning. Five levels of analysis of this justification are identified. Rules, principles and evaluations are used as justifying arguments and their characteristics determine the dimensions of rationality of decision depending on the features of rules, various conceptions of principles, and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Transparency and doubt: Understanding and interpretation in pragmatics and in law. [REVIEW]Marcelo Dascal & Jerzy Wróblewski - 1988 - Law and Philosophy 7 (2):427-450.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Normative conflicts in legal reasoning.Giovanni Sartor - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (2-3):209-235.
    This article proposes a formal analysis of a fundamental aspect of legal reasoning: dealing with normative conflicts. Firstly, examples are illustrated concerning the dynamics of legal systems, the application of rules and exceptions, and the semantic indeterminacy of legal sources. Then two approaches to cope with conflicting information are presented: the preferred theories of Brewka, and the belief change functions of Alchourrón, Gärdenfors, and Makinson. The relations between those approaches are closely examined, and some aspects of a model of reasoning (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations