Switch to: References

Citations of:

Biology and the Philosophy of Science

The Monist 48 (2):265-288 (1964)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Evolutionary morphology and evo-devo: hierarchy and novelty.A. C. Love - 2006 - Theory in Biosciences 124:317–333.
    Although the role of morphology in evolutionary theory remains a subject of debate, assessing the contributions of morphological investigation to evolutionary developmental biology (Evo-devo) is a more circumscribed issue of direct relevance to ongoing research. Historical studies of morphologically oriented researchers and the formation of the Modern Synthesis in the Anglo-American context identify a recurring theme: the synthetic theory of evolution did not capture multiple levels of biological organization. When this feature is incorporated into a philosophical framework for explaining the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • Panpsychic Organicism: Sewall Wright’s Philosophy for Understanding Complex Genetic Systems.David M. Steffes - 2007 - Journal of the History of Biology 40 (2):327-361.
    Sewall Wright first encountered the complex systems characteristic of gene combinations while a graduate student at Harvard's Bussey Institute from 1912 to 1915. In Mendelian breeding experiments, Wright observed a hierarchical dependence of the organism's phenotype on dynamic networks of genetic interaction and organization. An animal's physical traits, and thus its autonomy from surrounding environmental constraints, depended greatly on how genes behaved in certain combinations. Wright recognized that while genes are the material determinants of the animal phenotype, operating with great (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Mendelism, Plant Breeding and Experimental Cultures: Agriculture and the Development of Genetics in France. [REVIEW]Christophe Bonneuil - 2006 - Journal of the History of Biology 39 (2):281 - 308.
    The article reevaluates the reception of Mendelism in France, and more generally considers the complex relationship between Mendelism and plant breeding in the first half on the 20th century. It shows on the one side that agricultural research and higher education institutions have played a key role in the development and institutionalization of genetics in France, whereas university biologists remained reluctant to accept this approach on heredity. But on the other side, plant breeders, and agricultural researchers, despite an interest in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Is the evolutionary process deterministic or indeterministic? An argument for agnosticism.Roberta L. Millstein - 2000
    Recently, philosophers of biology have debated the status of the evolutionary process: is it deterministic or indeterministic? I argue that there is insufficient reason to favor one side of the debate over the other, and that a more philosophically defensible position argues neither for the determinacy nor for the indeterminacy of the evolutionary process. In other words, I maintain that the appropriate stand to take towards the question of the determinism of the evolutionary process is agnosticism. I then suggest that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Whitehead and science education.Charles Birch - 1988 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 20 (2):33–41.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Charles Hartshorne.Dan Dombrowski - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations