Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)Forking and dividing in fields with several orderings and valuations.Will Johnson - 2022 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 22 (1):2150025.
    We consider existentially closed fields with several orderings, valuations, and [Formula: see text]-valuations. We show that these structures are NTP2 of finite burden, but usually have the independence property. Moreover, forking agrees with dividing, and forking can be characterized in terms of forking in ACVF, RCF, and [Formula: see text]CF.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (1 other version)Forking and dividing in fields with several orderings and valuations.Will Johnson - 2021 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 22 (1).
    We consider existentially closed fields with several orderings, valuations, and p-valuations. We show that these structures are NTP2 of finite burden, but usually have the independence property. Mo...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Non-forking and preservation of NIP and dp-rank.Pedro Andrés Estevan & Itay Kaplan - 2021 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (6):102946.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Forking in short and tame abstract elementary classes.Will Boney & Rami Grossberg - 2017 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 168 (8):1517-1551.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Dense codense predicates and the NTP 2.Alexander Berenstein & Hyeung-Joon Kim - 2016 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 62 (1-2):16-24.
    We show that if T is any geometric theory having the NTP2 then the corresponding theories of lovely pairs of models of T and of H‐structures associated to T also have the NTP2. We also prove that if T is strong then the same two expansions of T are also strong.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Hereditary G-compactness.Tomasz Rzepecki - 2021 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 60 (7):837-856.
    We introduce the notion of hereditary G-compactness. We provide a sufficient condition for a poset to not be hereditarily G-compact, which we use to show that any linear order is not hereditarily G-compact. Assuming that a long-standing conjecture about unstable NIP theories holds, this implies that an NIP theory is hereditarily G-compact if and only if it is stable -categorical theories). We show that if G is definable over A in a hereditarily G-compact theory, then \. We also include a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On Amalgamation in NTP2 Theories and Generically Simple Generics.Pierre Simon - 2020 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 61 (2):233-243.
    We prove a couple of results on NTP2 theories. First, we prove an amalgamation statement and deduce from it that the Lascar distance over extension bases is bounded by 2. This improves previous work of Ben Yaacov and Chernikov. We propose a line of investigation of NTP2 theories based on S1 ideals with amalgamation and ask some questions. We then define and study a class of groups with generically simple generics, generalizing NIP groups with generically stable generics.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Pseudo real closed fields, pseudo p-adically closed fields and NTP2.Samaria Montenegro - 2017 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 168 (1):191-232.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations