Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Confucian Welfarism: Intellectual Origins of Solidarity for Health and Welfare Systems.Ming-Jui Yeh - 2023 - Public Health Ethics 16 (3):232-244.
    Solidarity is presumed to underpin the redistributive health and welfare systems in modern democracies; however, it is often considered a Western—or more specifically, European—concept. While health and welfare systems have been transplanted successfully to many non-Western developed countries, whether the solidarity necessary for such systems exists or is intellectually available remains under debate. Using an East Asian country with the Confucian tradition as an illustrative case, I first argue that the Confucian tradition has special theoretical and sociological importance for health (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Constructing ‘others’ and a wider ‘we’ as emotional processes: A case of South Korea in times of crisis.Jae-Eun Noh - 2022 - Thesis Eleven 170 (1):43-57.
    This article examines how growing fears, insecurities and uncertainties during the COVID-19 pandemic have prompted an emotional distance from others. The aim is to explore how global solidarity and nationalism are challenged and constructed as collective emotional processes concerning ‘others’. Drawing on social theories of emotions during crises and emotions towards others, this study looks at policy decisions around vaccines and health services and their associated emotions in the context of Korea, which has a relatively small migrant population and a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Universalists, Republicans and Rationalists: Exploring Health Sector Solidarity and Its Boundary through the Comparative Experience of Overseas Taiwanese.Ming-Jui Yeh, Yi-Hua Yang & Yi-Ren Lin - 2023 - Public Health Ethics 16 (1):35-52.
    Through users’ cross-system comparative experience engaging with the health systems in Taiwan and other countries, this article probes into their understandings and value judgments and specifically their reasonings for the ‘solidarity with whom?’ question in the health sector solidarity. With the cross-system comparison approach, the study adopted semi-structured interviews with 30 Taiwanese participants who have studied, lived or worked abroad and engaged with the health system in Canada, the USA or the UK. This approach offers the opportunity for one to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark