Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Immigration Rights and the Justification of Immigration Restrictions.Caleb Yong - 2017 - Journal of Social Philosophy 48 (4):461-480.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • EU migration, out-of-work benefits and reciprocity: Are member states justified in restricting access to welfare rights?Dimitrios Efthymiou - 2019 - European Journal of Political Theory 20 (3):547-567.
    This article examines whether restrictions on access to welfare rights for EU immigrants are justifiable on grounds of reciprocity. Recently political theorists have supported some robust restricti...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Cities, selective admission, and economic sorting.Lior Glick - 2020 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 19 (3):274-292.
    In the last few decades, residency in some of the world’s desired destination cities has become a privilege, as housing supply has not kept pace with population growth. This has led to a significant rise in housing prices and consequently to the exclusion of middle- and low-income populations on a large scale. These developments have received only scant attention in political theory despite their prominence in local policymaking and their contribution to processes of redrawing the boundaries of inclusion into local (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Commuters, Located Life Interests, and the City's Demos.Lior Glick - 2020 - Journal of Political Philosophy 29 (4):480-495.
    Journal of Political Philosophy, Volume 29, Issue 4, Page 480-495, December 2021.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Cooperation, Democracy, and Coercion: On the Grounds and Scope of Freedom of Movement.Borja Niño Arnaiz - forthcoming - Moral Philosophy and Politics.
    It is often believed that domestic principles of justice cannot ground freedom of international movement. Some argue that since principles of justice are not global in scope, justice does not require freedom of movement at the global level. This is problematic, for it confuses the grounds with the scope of justice. Given that the scope of justice is potentially global, freedom of movement must also be global in scope. Others have argued that the grounds of freedom of movement themselves are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark