Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. New Perspectives on Base of the Pyramid Strategies.Jenny Hillemann, Jeremy Hall, Alain Verbeke, Laura Michelini & Nikolay A. Dentchev - 2022 - Business and Society 61 (8):1977-1991.
    The early literature on base of the pyramid strategies argued that multinational enterprises can contribute significantly to poverty alleviation of the poorest population in the world. An emergent perspective suggests that the solution to poverty lies within the BOP itself. Here, entrepreneurship within the BOP population is seen as the more credible solution to poverty. In this Special Issue introduction, we briefly present how the literature has further shifted the discussion of BOP strategies toward issues such as innovation, networks, business (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Relational or Transactional? The Importance of Distinguishing Two Types of Community-Supported Business Models.Michaela Hausdorf & Jana-Michaela Timm - forthcoming - Business and Society.
    Scholars are increasingly exploring community-supported businesses (CSBs) as promising alternatives to conventional ones. However, researchers are so far overlooking that CSBs vary in their underlying business models, that is, how they propose, create, and capture value. We apply a multi-staged qualitative research process to carve out the differences between community-supported business models (CSBMs) that exist in practice. Our research shows that transactional and relational CSBMs differ in how they propose, create, and capture value which, in turn, has implications for the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Defining Value in Sustainable Business Models.Cristina Neesham, Krzysztof Dembek & Julia Benkert - 2023 - Business and Society 62 (7):1378-1419.
    Although the concept of value is central to sustainable business models (SBMs), the field has struggled to clarify what value is. SBM research accounts for multiple forms of value directed at multiple stakeholders. We argue that this diversity challenge should be addressed not by seeking a field-unifying definition of value but by developing methodological guidelines for a field-specific approach to defining value in SBM contexts. Based on Aristotelian logic and philosophical phenomenology of value, we develop an analytical framework that can (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation