Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Male Fertility-Related mHealth: Does It Create New Vulnerabilities?Michiel De Proost - 2023 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 16 (2):199-208.
    Male fertility–related mHealth (MFmHealth), including smartphone applications that allow men to test their fertility at home, is getting some attention now and then. In this commentary, I argue that MFmHealth technology has the potential to undermine established norms around male reproduction but cannot be examined using traditional individualist frameworks in bioethics. Instead, theoretical literature on the concept of vulnerability in feminist bioethics allow a theoretical alliance with critical studies of men and masculinities. Proposed benefits like empowerment, shared responsibility, and democratization (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Normative implications of postgenomic deterministic narratives: the case study of epigenetic harm.Emma Moormann - 2024 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 46 (4):1-26.
    What do we mean when we talk about epigenetic harm? This paper presents a multidimensional view of epigenetic harm. It is a plea to take a step back from discussions of epigenetic responsibility distributions prevalent in ELSA literature on epigenetics. Instead, it urges researchers to take a closer look at the normative role played by the concept of epigenetic harm. It starts out by showing that the ways in which the object of epigenetic responsibility has already been conceptualized are all (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark