Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Samuel Alexander on relations, Russell, and Bradley.Oliver Thomas Spinney - 2023 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 32 (3):564-586.
    In this article I describe the contributions made by Samuel Alexander to the issue of relations which so vexed Bertrand Russell and F. H. Bradley in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. I provide a novel understanding of Alexander’s position concerning relations and describe the way in which he viewed his position as superior to those of Bradley and Russell. I offer, therefore, a more complete picture of a philosophical debate central to the relevant period, through the introduction of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Depiction in the Tractatus: The Dissolution of the Problem of Unity.María Cerezo - 2018 - Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (3):327-332.
    ABSTRACTI revise Zalabardo’s solution to the Tractarian problem of unity and raise some difficulties concerning the notion of logical instantiation, his understanding of the notion of expression (A...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • ‘Ultimate’ Facts? Zalabardo on the Metaphysics of Truth.Juliet Floyd - 2018 - Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (3):299-314.
    ABSTRACTZalabardo argues that the Tractatus account of picturing is a direct and successful refutation of Russell’s ‘multiple relation’ theory of judgment, its role being ontological: Wittgenstein...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • On Wittgenstein's and Carnap's Conceptions of the Dissolution of Philosophical Problems, and against a Therapeutic Mix: How to Solve the Paradox of the Tractatus.Oskari Kuusela - 2019 - Philosophical Investigations 42 (3):213-240.
    In this article, I distinguish Wittgenstein's conception of the dissolution of philosophical problems from that of Carnap. I argue that the conception of dissolution assumed by the therapeutic interpretations of the Tractatus is more similar to Carnap's than to Wittgenstein's for whom dissolution involves spelling out an alternative in the context of which relevant problems do not arise. To clarify this I outline a non‐therapeutic resolute reading of the Tractatus that explains how Wittgenstein thought to be able to make a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark