Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Danger of Double Effect.Philip A. Reed - 2012 - Christian Bioethics 18 (3):287-300.
    In this paper, I argue that the doctrine of double effect is disposed toward abuse. I try to identify two distinct sources of abuse of double effect: the conditions associated with standard formulations of double effect and the difficulty of fully understanding one’s own intentions in action. Both of these sources of abuse are exacerbated in complex circumstances, where double effect is most often employed. I raise this concern about abuse not as a criticism of double effect but rather as (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Moral Object in the "Phoenix Case": A Defense of Sister McBride's Decision.P. McCruden - 2012 - Christian Bioethics 18 (3):301-311.
    The “Phoenix Case” brought into public scrutiny a contemporary debate in Catholic moral theology over competing views on the relation of the object of the act to the physical structure of acts that arise from moral choices. A procedure that was described by hospital officials and their parent company as an indirect abortion was judged by the local ordinary, Bishop Thomas Olmsted, as a direct abortion. A debate ensued between Bishop Olmsted and Catholic Health Care West and their advisors. Eventually, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation