Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Michel Foucault’s limit-experience limited.Marianna Papastephanou - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (4):390-403.
    Educational philosophy has not discussed Foucault’s publications on the Iranian Revolution and the related controversy. Foucauldian concepts are applied to education, though his only writings which ‘sidetracked’ him from exploring power within the state, namely, his journalistic accounts of his visits to Iran, remain unexplored in our field. Against moralist accusations of Foucault’s views on Iran as ‘singularly uncritical’, and beyond standard postcolonial charges of Foucault with exoticism and orientalism, I examine how the writings in question reveal ambivalences and limits (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Peace education and peace education research: Toward a concept of poststructural violence and second-order reflexivity.Kevin Kester & Hilary Cremin - 2017 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (14):1415-1427.
    Peace and conflict studies education has grown significantly in the last 30 years, mainly in Higher Education. This article critically analyzes the ways in which this field might be subject to poststructural critique, and posits Bourdieusian second-order reflexivity as a means of responding to these critiques. We propose here that theory-building within PACS education is often limited by the dominance of Galtung and Freire, and that, while the foundational ideas of positive and negative peace, structural and cultural violence, conscientization, reflexivity (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The Ethico‐politics of Teacher Identity.Matthew Clarke - 2009 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 41 (2):185-200.
    Identity is a contemporary buzzword in education, referencing the individual and the social, the personal and the political, self and other. Following Maggie MacLure, we can think of identity in terms of teachers ‘arguing for themselves’, or giving an account of themselves. Yet in the wake of poststructuralism's radical de‐centering of the subject and its highlighting of a number of impediments to agency, we might well ask how teachers are to give an account of themselves? This paper offers reading of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations