Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Self-training improves few-shot learning in legal artificial intelligence tasks.Yulin Zhou, Yongbin Qin, Ruizhang Huang, Yanping Chen, Chuan Lin & Yuan Zhou - forthcoming - Artificial Intelligence and Law:1-17.
    As the labeling costs in legal artificial intelligence tasks are expensive. Therefore, it becomes a challenge to utilize low cost to train a robust model. In this paper, we propose a LAIAugment approach, which aims to enhance the few-shot learning capability in legal artificial intelligence tasks. Specifically, we first use the self-training approach to label the amount of unlabelled data to enhance the feature learning capability of the model. Moreover, we also search for datasets that are similar to the training (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A neural network to identify requests, decisions, and arguments in court rulings on custody.José Félix Muñoz-Soro, Rafael del Hoyo Alonso, Rosa Montañes & Francisco Lacueva - forthcoming - Artificial Intelligence and Law:1-35.
    Court rulings are among the most important documents in all legal systems. This article describes a study in which natural language processing is used for the automatic characterization of Spanish judgments that deal with the physical custody (joint or individual) of minors. The model was trained to identify a set of elements: the type of custody requested by the plaintiff, the type of custody decided on by the court, and eight of the most commonly used arguments in this type of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark