Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Know Thyself, Improve Thyself: Personalized LLMs for Self-Knowledge and Moral Enhancement.Alberto Giubilini, Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Cristina Voinea, Brian Earp & Julian Savulescu - 2024 - Science and Engineering Ethics 30 (6):1-15.
    In this paper, we suggest that personalized LLMs trained on information written by or otherwise pertaining to an individual could serve as artificial moral advisors (AMAs) that account for the dynamic nature of personal morality. These LLM-based AMAs would harness users’ past and present data to infer and make explicit their sometimes-shifting values and preferences, thereby fostering self-knowledge. Further, these systems may also assist in processes of self-creation, by helping users reflect on the kind of person they want to be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Enabling Demonstrated Consent for Biobanking with Blockchain and Generative AI.Caspar Barnes, Mateo Riobo Aboy, Timo Minssen, Jemima Winifred Allen, Brian D. Earp, Julian Savulescu & Sebastian Porsdam Mann - forthcoming - American Journal of Bioethics:1-16.
    Participation in research is supposed to be voluntary and informed. Yet it is difficult to ensure people are adequately informed about the potential uses of their biological materials when they donate samples for future research. We propose a novel consent framework which we call “demonstrated consent” that leverages blockchain technology and generative AI to address this problem. In a demonstrated consent model, each donated sample is associated with a unique non-fungible token (NFT) on a blockchain, which records in its metadata (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Generative AI and medical ethics: the state of play.Hazem Zohny, Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Brian D. Earp & John McMillan - 2024 - Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (2):75-76.
    Since their public launch, a little over a year ago, large language models (LLMs) have inspired a flurry of analysis about what their implications might be for medical ethics, and for society more broadly. 1 Much of the recent debate has moved beyond categorical evaluations of the permissibility or impermissibility of LLM use in different general contexts (eg, at work or school), to more fine-grained discussions of the criteria that should govern their appropriate use in specific domains or towards certain (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • AUTOGEN and the Ethics of Co-Creation with Personalized LLMs—Reply to the Commentaries.Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Brian D. Earp, Nikolaj Møller, Vynn Suren & Julian Savulescu - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (3):6-14.
    In this reply to our commentators, we respond to ethical concerns raised about the potential use (or misuse) of personalized LLMs for academic idea and prose generation, including questions about c...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations