- A Kuhnian Critique of Psychometric Research on Peer Review.Carole J. Lee - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (5):859-870.details
|
|
Social Biases and Solution for Procedural Objectivity.Carole J. Lee & Christian D. Schunn - 2011 - Hypatia 26 (2):352-73.details
|
|
Normal Accidents of Expertise.Stephen P. Turner - 2010 - Minerva 48 (3):239-258.details
|
|
The referee’s dilemma. The ethics of scientific communities and game theory.Tomislav Bracanovic - 2002 - Prolegomena 1 (1):55-74.details
|
|
Interrogating the Meaning of ‘Quality’ in Utterances and Activities Protected by Academic Freedom.Joseph C. Hermanowicz - forthcoming - Journal of Academic Ethics:1-17.details
|
|
What is a social pattern? Rethinking a central social science term.Hernan Mondani & Richard Swedberg - 2022 - Theory and Society 51 (4):543-564.details
|
|
The Reference Class Problem for Credit Valuation in Science.Carole J. Lee - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (5):1026-1036.details
|
|
Impact of Alumni Connections on Peer Review Ratings and Selection Success Rate in National Research.Dong-Seong Han, Gil-Mo Kang, Soogwan Doh & Duckhee Jang - 2017 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 42 (1):116-143.details
|
|
Fairness as Appropriateness: Negotiating Epistemological Differences in Peer Review.Joshua Guetzkow, Michèle Lamont & Grégoire Mallard - 2009 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 34 (5):573-606.details
|
|
Innovating editorial practices: academic publishers at work.Willem Halffman & Serge P. J. M. Horbach - 2020 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 5 (1).details
|
|
Journal Peer Review and Editorial Evaluation: Cautious Innovator or Sleepy Giant?Serge P. J. M. Horbach & Willem Halffman - 2020 - Minerva 58 (2):139-161.details
|
|
Pluralism and Peer Review in Philosophy.J. Katzav & K. Vaesen - 2017 - Philosophers' Imprint 17.details
|
|
Consensus, Civility, and Community: The Origins of Minerva and the Vision of Edward Shils.Roy MacLeod - 2016 - Minerva 54 (3):255-292.details
|
|
Communism and the Incentive to Share in Science.Remco Heesen - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (4):698-716.details
|
|
International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching.Michael R. Matthews (ed.) - 2014 - Springer.details
|
|
Peer review: An unflattering picture.Kenneth M. Adams - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):135-136.details
|
|
The predictive validity of peer review: A neglected issue.Robert F. Bornstein - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):138-139.details
|
|
When nonreliability of reviews indicates solid science.Douglas Lee Eckberg - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):145-146.details
|
|
Peer review is not enough: Editors must work with librarians to ensure access to research.Steve Fuller - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):147-148.details
|
|
Is unreliability in peer review harmful?Henry L. Roediger - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):159-160.details
|
|
Some indices of the reliability of peer review.Robert Rosenthal - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):160-161.details
|
|
In praise of randomness.Peter H. Schönemann - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):162-163.details
|
|
The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):119-135.details
|
|
The limited effectiveness of prestige as an intervention on the health of medical journal publications.Carole J. Lee - 2013 - Episteme 10 (4):387-402.details
|
|
The Culture of Mediocrity.Joseph C. Hermanowicz - 2013 - Minerva 51 (3):363-387.details
|
|
A Prehistory of Peer Review: Religious Blueprints from the Hartlib Circle.Brent Tibor Ranalli - 2011 - Spontaneous Generations 5 (1):12-18.details
|
|
Peer-to-peer Review and the Future of Scholarly Authority.Kathleen Fitzpatrick - 2010 - Social Epistemology 24 (3):161-179.details
|
|
Using a dialectical scientific brief in Peer review.Arthur Stamps - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):85-98.details
|
|
Progressive and degenerative journals: on the growth and appraisal of knowledge in scholarly publishing.Daniel J. Dunleavy - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (4):1-27.details
|
|
Editorial Work and the Peer Review Economy of STS Journals.Maria Amuchastegui, Kean Birch & Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner - 2022 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 47 (4):670-697.details
|
|
Social exclusion in academia through biases in methodological quality evaluation: On the situation of women in science and philosophy.Anna Leuschner - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:56-63.details
|
|
Social Studies of Science and Science Teaching.Gábor Kutrovátz & Gábor Áron Zemplén - 2014 - In Michael R. Matthews (ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer. pp. 1119-1141.details
|
|
From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer Review.David Pontille & Didier Torny - 2015 - Human Studies 38 (1):57-79.details
|
|
Reflections from the peer review mirror.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):167-186.details
|
|
The process of peer review: Unanswered questions.Linda D. Nelson - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):158-159.details
|
|
Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review.John C. Bailar - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):137-138.details
|
|
On forecasting validity and finessing reliability.J. Barnard Gilmore - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):148-149.details
|
|
Managing the Growth of Peer Review at the Royal Society Journals, 1865-1965.Pierpaolo Dondio, Didier Torny, Flaminio Squazzoni & Aileen Fyfe - 2020 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 45 (3):405-429.details
|
|
Confusion between reviewer reliability and wise editorial and funding decisions.Charles A. Kiesler - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):151-152.details
|
|
Should the blinded lead the blinded?Stephen P. Lock - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):156-157.details
|
|
Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings?J. Scott Armstrong & Raymond Hubbard - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):136-137.details
|
|
Using a dialectical scientific brief in peer review.Arthur Stamps - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):85-98.details
|
|
On Not Doing the Papers of Great Scientists.Nathan Reingold - 1987 - British Journal for the History of Science 20 (1):29-38.details
|
|
Advances in peer review research: an introduction.Arthur E. Stamps Iii - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):3-10.details
|
|
Do we really want more “reliable” reviewers?Helena Chmura Kraemer - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):152-154.details
|
|
Why is the reliability of peer review so low?Donald Laming - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):154-156.details
|
|
Child Care, Research Collaboration, and Gender Differences in Scientific Productivity.Mari Teigen & Svein Kyvik - 1996 - Science, Technology and Human Values 21 (1):54-71.details
|
|
Introduction: Intellectual Property and Diverse Rights of Ownership in Science.Harriet A. Zuckerman - 1988 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 13 (1-2):7-16.details
|
|
What Roles for Scientific Associations in Contemporary Science?Ana Delicado, Raquel Rego, Cristina Palma Conceição, Inês Pereira & Luís Junqueira - 2014 - Minerva 52 (4):439-465.details
|
|
Using a dialectical scientific brief in peer review.Arthur Stamps Iii - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):85-98.details
|
|