Harming Some to Benefit Others: Animal Rights and the Moral Imperative of Trap-Neuter-Release Programs

Between the Species 21 (1) (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Because spaying/neutering animals involves the harming of some animals in order to prevent harm to others, some ethicists, like David Boonin, argue that the philosophy of animal rights is committed to the view that spaying/neutering animals violates the respect principle and that Trap Neuter Release programs are thus impermissible. In response, I demonstrate that the philosophy of animal rights holds that, under certain conditions, it is justified, and sometimes even obligatory, to cause harm to some animals in order to prevent greater harm to others. As I will argue, causing lesser harm to some animals in order to prevent greater harm to others, as TNR programs do, is compatible with the recognition of the inherent value of the ones who are harmed. Indeed, we can, and do, spay/neuter cats while acknowledging that they have value in their own right.

Author's Profile

Cheryl (C.E.) Abbate
University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-18

Downloads
240 (#33,934)

6 months
25 (#40,294)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?