Against Depictive Conventionalism

American Philosophical Quarterly 42 (3):185 - 197 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper, I discuss the influential view that depiction, like language, depends on arbitrary conventions. I argue that this view, however it is elaborated, is false. Any adequate account of depiction must be consistent with the distinctive features of depiction. One such feature is depictive generativity. I argue that, to be consistent with depictive generativity, conventionalism must hold that depiction depends on conventions for the depiction of basic properties of a picture’s object. I then argue that two considerations jointly preclude depiction from being governed by such conventions. Firstly, conventions must be salient to those who employ them. Secondly, those parts of pictures that depict basic properties of objects are not salient to the makers and interpreters of pictures.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-05-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Depiction and Convention.Ben Blumson - 2008 - Dialectica 62 (3):335-348.
Pictorial Realism.Abell, Catharine

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
34 ( #34,617 of 40,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #35,755 of 40,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.