Moral distance in dictators games

Judgment and Decision Making 3 (4):344-354 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
We perform an experimental investigation using a dictator game in which individuals must make a moral decision —to give or not to give an amount of money to poor people in the Third World. A questionnaire in which the subjects are asked about the reasons for their decision shows that, at least in this case, moral motivations carry a heavy weight in the decision: the majority of dictators give the money for reasons of a consequentialist nature. Based on the results presented here and of other analogous experiments, we conclude that dicator behavior can be understood in terms of moral distance rather than social distance and that it systematically deviates from the egoism assumption in economic models and game theory.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2009-11-30
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
293 ( #20,390 of 59,975 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #51,080 of 59,975 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.