Accuracy and Statistical Evidence

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Abstract. Suppose that the word of an eyewitness makes it 80% probable that A committed a crime, and that B is drawn from a population in which the incidence rate of that crime is 80%. Many philosophers and legal theorists have held that if this is our only evidence against those parties then (i) we may be justified in finding against A but not against B; but (ii) that doing so incurs a loss in the accuracy of our findings. This paper argues against (ii). It argues that accuracy considerations can motivate taking different attitudes towards individualized and statistical evidence even across cases where they generate the same probability that the defendant is guilty.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
AHMAAS
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-11-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-11-02

Total views
40 ( #37,906 of 43,830 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #18,281 of 43,830 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.