How non-epistemic values can be epistemically beneficial in scientific classification

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The boundaries of social categories are frequently altered to serve normative projects, such as social reform. Griffiths and Khalidi argue that the value-driven modification of categories diminishes the epistemic value of social categories. I argue that concerns over value-modified categories stem from problematic assumptions of the value-free ideal of science. Contrary to those concerns, non-epistemic value considerations can contribute to the epistemic improvement of a scientific category. For example, the early history of the category infantile autism shows how non-epistemic value considerations can contribute to delimiting and establishing infantile autism as a distinct category in mainstream psychiatry. In the case of infantile autism, non-epistemic considerations have led to a new interpretation of existing data, the expansion of research to include biology, and the creation of diagnostic criteria that further contribute to collecting relevant data. Given this case study, it can be argued that non-epistemic values can improve our knowledge of scientific categories.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-08-18
Latest version: 2 (2020-08-20)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
210 ( #26,982 of 2,432,313 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
164 ( #3,381 of 2,432,313 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.