Three objections to the epistemic theory of argument rebutted
Argumentation and Advocacy 44:130-142 (2008)
Abstract
Three objections to the epistemic theory of argument are presented and briefly rebutted. In light of this reply, a case for argumentative eclecticism is made.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
AIKTOT
Upload history
Archival date: 2012-10-26
View other versions
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
329 ( #16,589 of 57,074 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #28,583 of 57,074 )
2009-01-28
Total views
329 ( #16,589 of 57,074 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #28,583 of 57,074 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.