Three objections to the epistemic theory of argument rebutted

Argumentation and Advocacy 44:130-142 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Three objections to the epistemic theory of argument are presented and briefly rebutted. In light of this reply, a case for argumentative eclecticism is made.

Author's Profile

Scott Aikin
Vanderbilt University

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
548 (#28,190)

6 months
89 (#43,630)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?