J.L. Austin ve I. Kant’ta Kategorik Önermeler ve Mental Nedensellik Problemleri

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
One of the central figures of philosophy of language- John Langshaw Austin, attributes principles of causation to the mere pragmatic language. Conversely, Kant tried to construct a “free human act” which is independent from any physical determination except its innate motivations via his well-known the phenomenal / noumenal distinction. That kind of Kantian metaphysical ground which addresses to the noumenal field, he obviously tries to establish this behavioral causation again by denying Austinian style pragmatic propositions or illocutionary acts. I claimed that sort of duality between Austin and Kant, creates an epistemological problem with how propositions and actions relate. From a Kantian position, it (indetermination) is overlooked by Austin's propositional doctrine, without being grounded on any universal principle, but only with propositions that embraced by speech act theory.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-08-08
Latest version: 3 (2020-08-08)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
192 ( #35,681 of 69,150 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #29,552 of 69,150 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.