Modern Paradoxes of Aristotle’s Logic

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper intends to explain key differences between Aristotle’s understanding of the relationships between nous, epistêmê, and the art of syllogistic reasoning(both analytic and dialectical) and the corresponding modern conceptions of intuition, knowledge, and reason. By uncovering paradoxa that Aristotle’s understanding of syllogistic reasoning presents in relation to modern philosophical conceptions of logic and science, I highlight problems of a shift in modern philosophy—a shift that occurs most dramatically in the seventeenth century—toward a project of construction, a pervasive desire for rational certainty, and a general insistence on the reducibility of the sciences. The major motivation of this analysis is my intention to show that modern attempts to reduce science/epistêmê to a single science/method of inquiry occlude dialectical and ethico-political dimensions of “reason” and, hence, also impoverish philosophy’s critical capacities
ISBN(s)
1085-1968
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ALEMPO
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-04-12
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
709 ( #6,106 of 55,848 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #38,209 of 55,848 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.