Causation, Norm violation, and culpable control

Journal of Philosophy 108 (12):670-696 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Causation is one of philosophy's most venerable and thoroughly-analyzed concepts. However, the study of how ordinary people make causal judgments is a much more recent addition to the philosophical arsenal. One of the most prominent views of causal explanation, especially in the realm of harmful or potentially harmful behavior, is that unusual or counternormative events are accorded privileged status in ordinary causal explanations. This is a fundamental assumption in psychological theories of counterfactual reasoning, and has been transported to philosophy by Hitchcock and Knobe (2009). A different view--the basis of the culpable control model of blame (CCM)--is that primary causal status is accorded to behaviors that arouse negative evaluative reactions, including behaviors that stem from nefarious motives, negligence or recklessness, a faulty character, or behaviors that lead to harmful or potentially harmful consequences. This paper describes four empirical studies that show consistent support for the CCM.
Reprint years
2014
ISBN(s)
0022-362X  
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ALICNV
Upload history
Archival date: 2012-08-01
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-11-26

Total views
2,050 ( #1,121 of 53,537 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
135 ( #3,456 of 53,537 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.