Analytic Aesthetics and the Dilemma of Timelessness

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The paper highlights analytic aesthetics’ unacknowledged assumption that art is timeless, a view it inherited from Enlightenment thinkers such as Hume and Kant, who in turn inherited it from the Renaissance. This view, I contend, is no longer tenable because it is at odds with our experience of the art of the past. Analytic aesthetics avoids this key problem because it confines its attention to issues such as the nature of aesthetic pleasure, whether the appreciation of art should be disinterested and so on, which can be partitioned off from historical change and encased in a world where time stands still and where, by consequence, the temporal nature of art, including art’s capacity to transcend time, is ignored.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-04-11
Latest version: 2 (2019-04-08)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
110 ( #31,768 of 50,429 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #45,316 of 50,429 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.