Analytic Aesthetics and the Dilemma of Timelessness

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The paper highlights analytic aesthetics’ unacknowledged assumption that art is timeless, a view it inherited from Enlightenment thinkers such as Hume and Kant, who in turn inherited it from the Renaissance. This view, I contend, is no longer tenable because it is at odds with our experience of the art of the past. Analytic aesthetics bypasses this dilemma because it confines its attention to topics such as the nature of aesthetic pleasure, whether the appreciation of art should be disinterested and so on, which it partitions off from historical change and encases in a world where time stands still and where, by consequence, the temporal nature of art, including art’s capacity to transcend time, can be ignored.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-04-11
Latest version: 2 (2019-04-08)
View other versions
Added to PP

180 (#39,934)

6 months
18 (#44,264)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?