A Defence of Emotivism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
As a non-cognitivist analysis of moral language, Charles Stevenson's sophisticated emotivism is widely regarded by moral philosophers as a substantial improvement over its historical antecedent, radical emotivism. None the less, it has come in for its share of criticism. In this essay, Leslie Allan responds to the key philosophical objections to Stevenson's thesis, arguing that the criticisms levelled against his meta-ethical theory rest largely on a too hasty reading of his works.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-04-28
Latest version: 2 (2017-06-16)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Language of Morals.Chellas, Brian F.
Theories of Ethics.Foot, Philippa
Ethics Since 1900.Welsh, Paul & Warnock, Mary
Ethics Since 1900.Warnock, Mary

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
1,472 ( #1,684 of 50,429 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
324 ( #1,031 of 50,429 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.