Representation, Consciousness, and Time

Metaphysica 19 (1):137-155 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I criticize Bourget’s intuitive and empirical arguments for thinking that all possible conscious states are underived if intentional. An underived state is one of which it is not the case that it must be realized, at least in part, by intentional states distinct from itself. The intuitive argument depends upon a thought experiment about a subject who exists for only a split second while undergoing a single conscious experience. This, however, trades on an ambiguity in "split second." Meanwhile, Bourget's empirical argument is question-begging. My critique also has implications for debates about the essential temporality and unity of consciousness experience, and, phenomenal atomism
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-12-31
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
216 ( #29,399 of 64,128 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #42,096 of 64,128 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.