Frege Cases and Bad Psychological Laws

Mind (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We draw attention to a series of implicit assumptions that have structured the debate about Frege’s Puzzle. Once these assumptions are made explicit, we rely on them to show that if one focuses exclusively on the issues raised by Frege cases, then one obtains a powerful consideration against a fine-grained conception of propositional-attitude content. In light of this consideration, a form of Russellianism about content becomes viable.

Author Profiles

Mahrad Almotahari
University of Edinburgh
Aidan Gray
University of Illinois, Chicago

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-19

Downloads
342 (#24,900)

6 months
78 (#9,599)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?