Frege Cases and Bad Psychological Laws

Mind (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We draw attention to a series of implicit assumptions that have structured the debate about Frege’s Puzzle. Once these assumptions are made explicit, we rely on them to show that if one focuses exclusively on the issues raised by Frege cases, then one obtains a powerful consideration against a fine-grained conception of propositional-attitude content. In light of this consideration, a form of Russellianism about content becomes viable.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ALMFCA-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-12-19
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-12-19

Total views
199 ( #30,197 of 2,448,730 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
69 ( #8,758 of 2,448,730 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.