Supervenience and property-identical divine-command theory

Religious Studies 40 (3):323-333 (2004)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Property-identical divine-command theory (PDCT) is the view that being obligatory is identical to being commanded by God in just the way that being water is identical to being H2O. If these identity statements are true, then they express necessary a posteriori truths. PDCT has been defended in Robert M. Adams (1987) and William Alston (1990). More recently Mark C. Murphy (2002) has argued that property-identical divine-command theory is inconsistent with two well-known and well-received theses: the free-command thesis and the supervenience thesis. I show that Murphy's argument is vitiated by mistaken assumptions about the substitutivity of metaphysical identicals in contexts of supervenience. The free-command thesis and the supervenience thesis therefore pose no serious threat to PDCT. (Published Online August 11 2004).
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ALMSAP
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-04-14
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
202 ( #29,917 of 2,448,895 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #41,086 of 2,448,895 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.