Economics Imperialism Reconsidered

In Uskali Mäki, Adrian Walsh & Manuela Fernández Pinto (eds.), Scientific Imperialism: Exploring the Boundaries of Interdisciplinarity. London, UK: pp. 140-160 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This chapter uses Uskali Mäki’s (2009) concepts of “good” and “bad” imperialism to investigate the “economics imperialism” thesis. If science expands by offering (a) consilience, and (b) epistemological and ontological unity – that is, it explains more phenomena with greater parsimony – then this is good scientific expansion. Economics imperialism is only bad if the methodology of economics expands outside its domain without increasing understanding in the above manners.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-05-21
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
80 ( #42,631 of 57,073 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #30,479 of 57,073 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.