Utility, Universality, and Impartiality in Adam Smith’s Jurisprudence

The Adam Smith Review 4:238-246 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper examines how the concepts of utility, impartiality, and universality worked together to form the foundation of Adam Smith's jurisprudence. It argues that the theory of utility consistent with contemporary rational choice theory is insufficient to account for Smith's use of utility. Smith's jurisprudence relies on the impartial spectator's sympathetic judgment over whether third parties are injured, and not individuals' expected utility associated with individuals' expected gains from rendering judgments over innocence or guilt.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
AMAUUA
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-05-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2020-05-22

Total views
6 ( #49,878 of 48,817 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #48,086 of 48,817 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.