A Semantic Solution to the Problem with Aesthetic Testimony

Acta Analytica 30 (2):211-218 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
There is something peculiar about aesthetic testimony. It seems more difficult to gain knowledge of aesthetic properties based solely upon testimony than it is in the case of other types of property. In this paper, I argue that we can provide an adequate explanation at the level of the semantics of aesthetic language, without defending any substantive thesis in epistemology or about aesthetic value/judgement. If aesthetic predicates are given a non-invariantist semantics, we can explain the supposed peculiar difficulty with aesthetic testimony.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-08-11
View other versions
Added to PP

621 (#11,947)

6 months
25 (#34,514)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?