A Unique Propensity to Engage in Homosexual Acts

In Race, Gender, and Sexuality: Philosophical Issues of Identity and Justice (2003)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
After stating "I am gay" Navy Lieutenant Paul G. Thomasson was honorably discharged from the military. In Thomasson v. Perry (1996), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth District affirmed Thomasson's discharge. Thomasson is now considered the leading case evaluating the U.S. military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy. In this paper, I show that the court's analysis of the Department of Defense policy rests of two unarticulated and undefended assumptions about sexuality. The first is that an act of sex is essentially defined in terms of the sexual orientation of the persons engaging in that act. The second is that whether or not a person is an open homosexual determines the essential nature of the homosexual acts of others. I conclude that both assumptions are untenable, therefore the "don't ask, don't tell" policy is indefensible.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ANDAUP-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-08-25
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-03-07

Total views
559 ( #8,728 of 56,928 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #26,007 of 56,928 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.