On being genetically "irresponsible"

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (2):129-146 (2000)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
: New genetic technologies continue to emerge that allow us to control the genetic endowment of future children. Increasingly the claim is made that it is morally "irresponsible" for parents to fail to use such technologies when they know their possible children are at risk for a serious genetic disorder. We believe such charges are often unwarranted. Our goal in this article is to offer a careful conceptual analysis of the language of irresponsibility in an effort to encourage more care in its use. Two of our more important sub-claims are: A fair judgment of genetic irresponsibility necessarily requires a thick background description of the specific reproductive choice; and there is no necessary connection between an act's being morally wrong and its being irresponsible. These are distinct judgments requiring distinct justifications
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ANDOBG
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-09-09
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
560 ( #7,764 of 53,516 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #35,525 of 53,516 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.