Political Liberalism and the Interests of Children: A Reply to Timothy Michael Fowler

Res Publica 17 (3):291-296 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Timothy Michael Fowler has argued that, as a consequence of their commitment to neutrality in regard to comprehensive doctrines, political liberals face a dilemma. In essence, the dilemma for political liberals is that either they have to give up their commitment to neutrality (which is an indispensible part of their view), or they have to allow harm to children. Fowler’s case for this dilemma depends on ascribing to political liberals a view which grants parents a great degree of freedom in deciding on the education of their children. I show that ascribing this view to political liberals rests upon a misinterpretation of political liberalism. Since political liberals have access to reasons based upon the interests of children, they need not yield to parent’s wishes about the education of their children. A correct understanding of political liberalism thus shows that political liberals do not face the dilemma envisaged by Fowler
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ANDPLA
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-08-26
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-05-14

Total views
271 ( #9,905 of 38,041 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #19,706 of 38,041 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.