When to expect violations of causal faithfulness and why it matters

Philosophy of Science (5):672-683 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I present three reasons why philosophers of science should be more concerned about violations of causal faithfulness (CF). In complex evolved systems, mechanisms for maintaining various equilibrium states are highly likely to violate CF. Even when such systems do not precisely violate CF, they may nevertheless generate precisely the same problems for inferring causal structure from probabilistic relationships in data as do genuine CF-violations. Thus, potential CF-violations are particularly germane to experimental science when we rely on probabilistic information to uncover the DAG, rather than already knowing the DAG from which we could predict the right experiments to ‘catch out’ the hidden causal relationships.
Reprint years
2012, 2013
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ANDWTE
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-11-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Frugal Inference of Causal Relations.Forster, Malcolm; Raskutti, Garvesh; Stern, Reuben & Weinberger, Naftali
The Three Faces of Faithfulness.Zhang, Jiji & Spirtes, Peter

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-07-19

Total downloads
216 ( #12,006 of 37,176 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #12,690 of 37,176 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.