Defining topics in aristotle’s topics VI

Philósophos - Revista de Filosofia 19 (2):151-193 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I argue that Topics VI does not contain any serious theory about definitions, but only a collection of advices for formulating definitions in a dialectical context, namely, definitions aiming to catch what the opponent means. Topics VI is full of inconsistencies that can be explained away by this approach: the inconsistencies reflect "acceptable opinions about definitions" that distinct groups of interlocutors accept. I also argue that the "topoi" need not be pieces of serious theory Aristotle is commited to. The "topoi" must also be considered as "endoxa", namely, as accepted opinions about how it is legitimate to draw an inference
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-02-21
Latest version: 2 (2015-02-23)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
252 ( #26,055 of 64,136 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #58,586 of 64,136 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.