Ideal Utilitarianism: Rashdall and Moore

In Thomas Hurka (ed.), Underivative Duty: British Moral Philosophers From Sidgwick to Ewing. Oxford University Press. pp. 45-65 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Ideal utilitarianism states that the only fundamental requirement of morality is to promote a plurality of intrinsic goods. This paper critically evaluates Hastings Rashdall’s arguments for ideal utilitarianism, while comparing them with G. E. Moore’s arguments. Section I outlines Rashdall’s ethical outlook. Section II considers two different arguments that he provides for its theory of rightness. Section III discusses his defence of a pluralist theory of value. Section IV argues that Rashdall makes a lasting contribution to the defence of ideal utilitarianism.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ANTIUR
Revision history
Archival date: 2011-02-28
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-03-11

Total views
3,612 ( #303 of 43,936 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
431 ( #738 of 43,936 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.