Dissertation, Ignou (
2018)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
Man is a seeker by nature. He searches for truth. An ordinary man cannot be
indifferent to truth because of the deep quest within him for truth. Gandhi lived his whole
life in the perpetual quest for truth. He lived and moved in pursuit of this goal. This
pursuit of seeking truth under the banner of philosophical education makes educational
philosophizing moral. One can perfect these ideologies of different schools and make
philosophizing in education better by placing truth in the center. Thus, an idealist can
evolve a realization of truth, a naturalist can bring about the true nature and
potentialities of the individual, and pragmatists can rejuvenate the minds with a truth-oriented
strategy and existential thinkers can invite truth into them so that they can avoid fear and
dread. The Gandhian vision of Satya offers us the key to integral education. Following the footprints
of Satya not only satisfies the Gandhian aims for education but it also helps the human
person to continue his role on the earth as the seeker of truth.
The aim of my research is to explore whether the concept of the truth of Mahatma Gandhi could be
used as a platform for philosophical education? Can we take inspiration from Gandhian
thoughts so that philosophizing may not engage itself in hermeneutical violence to bring out
the truth (of our making) but a hermeneutical ahimsa that lets the truth show itself?
Truth for Gandhi was equal to one of his lungs. He spoke the truth, wrote on truth, and
exhorted people to be truthful. Gandhi made the concept of truth central to metaphysics,
epistemology, morality, and the philosophy of religion. Truth was the guiding principle for
Gandhi in all these disciplines.
When we bring in truth as the guiding principle in the philosophy of education we envisage an
educational community of all truth seekers traveling together in freedom to come to an ever-increasing approximation of truth. Should philosophy stop the pursuit of truth (satya) as Rorty claims? Is communication of truth
irrelevant as no truth is ascertainable as skeptics claim? Is the will to communicate truth
senseless since truth is an illusion? Do these approaches satisfy the philosophical minds that
are after truth?
The methodology I pursue in this thesis is an exploratory, analytical, and critical approach.
a) Analytical: The basic method to be used is to analyze the existing works and apprehend
their significance in the area of education, in particular philosophical education.
b) Critical: a critical and comprehensive analysis of the concept of truth is followed in the
research to represent the significance of truth in philosophical education.
Man cannot be indifferent to truth since there is a longing for truth in the heart of every
human being. Hence the need to search for it with all one’s might through success does
not come everyone’s way in the same measure. The reason for this is that there are
certain factors that impede our search and they even distort our understanding. They
are natural limitations of reason, inconsistency of the heart, worldly concerns, and fear of
the demand that truth makes. Hence it is necessary to overcome these in the search for
truth.
In his dealings with others, the human person wishes that the other may communicate his truth
and only truth. Gandhian invitation is to be an experimenter with truth. Truth is that all seek and
want above everything. No one wishes to compromise on that. When we bring in truth as the
guiding principle in the philosophy of education we envisage an educational community of all
truth seekers traveling together in freedom to come to an ever-increasing approximation of
truth. They are compelled to study and defend truth in a better way when they are confronted.
They will be forced to discern the core of truth from its formulations. That is the role of
the experimenter with the truth.
In this research paper, I attempt to present M. K. Gandhi as an educationist giving
emphasis only on his concept of truth. It is a limited approach to Gandhian educational
philosophy because when I attend only to the concept of truth I fail to include very many
other aspects of his educational philosophy like craft-centered education, teaching
methods, education for different sections of society, etc. It also limits me to criticizing Gandhian dislike for the higher education system appropriately. However, the notion of truth
is a common platform that could be shared by three important branches of philosophical
education, namely the naturalistic, the idealistic, and the pragmatic.