A Philosophical Inquiry into the Linguistic Findings of Writing Research Articles (RAs) in Philosophy A Case Study: The Genre Analysis of Abstracts in SOOCHOW JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES from 2017 to 2021(哲學家應當如何看待語言學家針對哲學論文給出研究結果與教學寫作建議? 以《東吳哲學學報》近五年18篇西方哲學論文摘要的語體分析結果作為起點)

跨領域哲學研究、教學與社會實踐:台灣哲學學會2023年學術研討會(Taiwanese Philosophical Association Annual Conference 2023) (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper, I expand my upon earlier linguistic research (Lian, 2023), which delved into the genre of abstracts from Western philosophical papers. I engage with the philosophical ramifications emanating from the guidelines established for crafting philosophy paper abstracts (Lian, 2023) and underscore their significance in the domain of academic philosophical writing. A pivotal focus of this research is to navigate the intricate philosophical challenges posed by cross-disciplinary investigations bridging applied linguistic statistics with philosophical paper composition, specifically, the nuanced interpretation of linguistic findings in a manner palatable to philosophers. My exploration probes into the dynamics of various concepts within Inter-Disciplinary Research (IDR), highlighting the complexities in reconciling semantic intuitions related to the notions of "Method (M)" and "Conclusion (C)". I delineate three philosophical stances: (1) deferring to scientific authority, (2) recognizing domain-specific terminologies, and (3) interrogating peripheral scientific theories. I posit that these stances significantly influence the ways philosophers engage with and resolve the cross-disciplinary semantic and theoretical contentions stemming from the rhetorical structures of "Method (M)" and "Conclusion (C)". This work proposes avenues to attain either "theoretical coherence" or "disciplinary synthesis", thereby fostering enhanced cross-disciplinary collaboration and fortifying academic discourse across diverse fields. Keywords: Inter-Disciplinary Research (IDR), Applied linguistics, Philosophical writing, Genre Analysis, Rhetorical Moves   本研究將先介紹筆者的語言學碩士論文(連,2023),如何分析《東吳哲學學報》2017年至2021年西方哲學論文摘要語體的修辭語步特徵與提供寫作建議,並試圖從哲學圈內人的角度,對連(2023)的哲學寫作建議進行批判性的反思,探討哲學教師或新手哲學家可以如何看待華文哲學論文摘要的寫作建議。接著,筆者將問題聚焦在跨領域學科(應用語言學統計結果與哲學論文寫作)之間的哲學問題,即——哲學家應如何看待語言學家針對哲學論文的研究結果。筆者將考慮領域間研究(IDR)的語言與詞語概念關係。而藉由討論上述跨領域研究中語義直覺分歧的問題,筆者提出了三種可能的哲學態度:(1)服從科學權威、(2)尊重特定領域用詞、(3)質疑邊緣科學理論。筆者認為,上述三種態度對於哲學家如何看待「方法(M)」和「結論(C)」這兩項跨領域語義概念分歧和可能理論分歧有著重要的影響。筆者希冀藉由提出相關解決方案來尋求「理論統一」或「領域整合」的可行性,最終得以促進跨領域合作與跨學門間良好學術交流的互動成長。 關鍵詞:領域間研究(IDR)、應用語言學、哲學寫作、語體分析、修辭語步

Author's Profile


Added to PP

102 (#81,496)

6 months
102 (#32,225)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?