Is it worth to fit the social sciences in the same track as the study of biological evolution?

Ludus Vitalis 8 (14):213-218 (2000)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
For some the gene-centered reductionism that permeates contemporary neo-Darwinism is an obstacle for finding a common explanatory framework for both biological and cultural evolution. Thus social scientists are tempted to find new concepts that might bridge the divide between biology and sociology. Yet since Aristotle we know that the level of explanation must be commensurate with the particular question to be answered. In modern natural science there are many instances where a reductionist approach has failed to provide the right answer to the corresponding question. Thus social scientists risk becoming non-relevant when mimicking some features of the natural sciences (such as hard or soft reductionism) just for the sake of it, instead of finding autonomous explanations commensurate with the level of phenomena studied by social science.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ARAIIW
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-02-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-01-19

Total views
63 ( #31,468 of 42,237 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #32,919 of 42,237 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.